What is planning, according to the definition used in this lesson?
Choose an answer, then check it.
Management & Leadership · Foundations
Planning
On this page 9 sections
In 30 seconds
Planning The management function of setting objectives and deciding the course of action to achieve them; the definition used in this lesson comes from OpenStax's Principles of Management. Full entry → is the management function of deciding the future in advance: setting Objectives The end states an organization hopes to attain; in OpenStax's terms, outcome or goal statements. Full entry → and deciding the course of action to achieve them. The working definition this lesson adopts comes from OpenStax's Principles of Management: planning is the process by which managers establish goals and specify how these goals are to be attained. Organizations plan for direction, coordination, and efficient use of resources. The main plan types are strategic, tactical, and operational. Because the future is uncertain, a plan is a hypothesis — reviewed and revised as conditions change.
Why this matters
Without a plan, effort scatters. A team that skips planning still makes decisions — they just make them one emergency at a time, in different directions. Planning gives an organization direction, so everyone moves toward the same objectives; coordination, so each team's work fits with the others'; and efficient use of resources, so money, time, and people are spent on what matters rather than on fixing avoidable surprises. It also forces honesty about the future: a plan is built on assumptions, and when those assumptions break, the plan should change. Whether you are running a study group, a fundraiser, or a company, planning is how you decide the future instead of letting it decide you.
The college version
What planning is: the working definition
Planning is the management function of deciding the future in advance. The working definition this lesson adopts comes from OpenStax's Principles of Management: planning is the process by which managers establish goals and specify how these goals are to be attained. Notice that the definition has two parts that mirror each other. Establish goals: decide what the organization is trying to reach — the end state, which OpenStax calls outcome or goal statements. Specify how these goals are to be attained: decide the means — who does what, when, and how — which OpenStax calls action statements. A plan that states only a destination is incomplete, and a plan full of activity but no destination is aimless. In the classic four management functions — planning, organizing, leading, and controlling — planning comes first, because the other functions organize people, lead them, and check results against the plan's standards. Organizing, leading, and controlling each get their own topics; this lesson stays with planning.
Why plan: direction, coordination, and resource use
OpenStax lists five reasons managers plan: to offset uncertainty and change, to focus organizational activity on a set of objectives, to provide a coordinated and systematic road map for future activities, to increase economic efficiency, and to facilitate control by setting a standard for later activity. This lesson groups them into three. Direction: a plan focuses everyone's work on the same objectives, so a bakery's bakers, counter staff, and delivery driver all push the same way. Coordination: a plan sequences and connects work, so the marketing push, the kitchen schedule, and the supplier orders line up instead of colliding. Resource use: planning raises efficiency, because money, time, and people are committed deliberately rather than spent reactively, and waste can be spotted before it happens. Even a small organization feels the difference: a student club that plans its fundraiser in advance raises more with less chaos than one that improvises.
The plan types: strategic, tactical, and operational
OpenStax describes plans by the level they serve. Strategic plans address the organization's institutional level: they outline a long-term vision, position the organization in its environment, and often begin with the mission — the statement of the organization's reason for being. Tactical plans are division-level or unit-level plans designed to help an organization accomplish its strategic plans. Operational plans provide direction and action statements for the organization's day-to-day technical core — the actual work of producing and delivering. One original example holds the three together. Cascade Coffee, a regional chain of forty stores, has a Strategic plan A long-term plan that positions the whole organization in its environment and is guided by the mission and vision. Full entry → to enter two new states within five years, anchored in its mission of serving great coffee in mid-sized cities. Its Tactical plan A division-level or unit-level plan designed to help the organization accomplish its strategic plan. Full entry →, owned by the regional managers, opens six new stores in the northern suburbs this year, specifying sites, teams, and budgets. Its operational plans are the store-opening checklists, staff schedules, and delivery routes that get each new store trading on time. OpenStax also notes contingency plans — alternative courses of action prepared for when planning assumptions turn out wrong, such as an airline's plan for a grounded fleet — which is the honest bridge to uncertainty.
The planning process: assess, set objectives, choose actions, monitor
OpenStax presents the planning process as a step-by-step model adapted from management scholars Harold Koontz and Cyril O'Donnell. This lesson uses a four-step version that keeps the spine of that model. Step one, assess the situation: build awareness of the present state — where the organization stands, its strengths and weaknesses, and its commitments. Step two, set objectives: establish outcome statements that say where the organization is headed. Step three, choose actions: determine a course of action — action statements specifying what needs to be done, when, how, and by whom — selected from alternatives. Step four, monitor: keep the plan under review, compare results against the outcome and action statements, and adjust — OpenStax notes plans must be administered with flexibility as conditions change, and it ties Monitoring The ongoing review of results against the plan, so the plan can be adjusted when conditions change. Full entry → to the Deming cycle of plan, do, check, act. A goal is the destination; the plan is the route. Goal-setting — how to write good objectives — is its own topic; this lesson treats goals as the input that planning turns into action.
Planning and uncertainty: the honest framing
Planning rests on Premises The assumptions about the future on which a plan is built; the quality of a plan depends on the quality of its premises. Full entry → — assumptions about what is likely to happen. OpenStax is blunt: the quality and success of any plan depends on the quality of its underlying assumptions, and those assumptions must be surfaced, monitored, and updated. That is why a plan is best treated as a hypothesis about the future: a reasoned guess, tested against reality, revised when reality disagrees. Corporate Finance Institute makes the same point about strategic plans: they must evolve as conditions change, and organizations review them on a regular rhythm. So the honest framing of this lesson is simple. A plan is not a promise that the future will cooperate; it is a commitment to a direction, made in the open, checked against the world, and changed when the world changes. The managers who look naive are the ones who treat their plan as carved in stone.
Eli explains
The same idea, in plain words
Explain it like I’m 10
Planning is deciding the future in advance: you pick where you want to end up, and you decide how you will get there before you start moving. A goal is the destination. The plan is the route — who does what, when, and how. Organizations plan for three reasons: so everyone pulls in the same direction, so the pieces of work fit together, and so money and time get spent wisely instead of wasted. Plans come in three sizes: strategic plans set the long-term direction for the whole organization, tactical plans turn that direction into what each division will do, and operational plans cover the day-to-day work. Planning itself runs in four steps: look at where you are, set your objectives, choose your actions, and keep checking. The honest truth: a plan is a hypothesis about the future, built on assumptions. When conditions change, the plan changes too.
Picture it like this
Think of a family road trip. The destination — the beach town — is the goal. The plan is the route: which highway, which stops, who drives which leg, and what time everyone needs to be in the car. The driver checks the map along the way, and when a bridge is closed for repairs, the family takes a different road. The destination did not change; the route did.
Where the picture stops working
The analogy has limits. On a road trip the roads are known and the map is fixed, while in business the conditions themselves keep changing and no one has a complete map of the future. A business plan also does more than pick a route — it commits money and people, and changing it means coordinating many people, not just turning the wheel. And a GPS recalculates in seconds; revising an organizational plan takes review, communication, and time.
Worked example
Watch planning run in one business. Willow & Vine, a downtown flower shop, wants to grow. Step one, assess: the owner reviews two years of sales, notices that wedding orders are strongest in spring, and checks that rival shops close at 5 p.m. Step two, set objectives: raise wedding-bouquet revenue by 30 percent before next May. Step three, choose actions: open Saturdays from 9 to 4, hire one part-time designer in February, and book two bridal-show tables in January and March. Step four, monitor: the owner tracks weekly bouquet sales against last year and reviews the plan monthly — and when a rival starts offering free delivery, she adds it to the plan. The destination stayed; the route changed.
Key takeaway
Planning is deciding the future in advance: set objectives, choose the course of action to reach them, and keep checking the plan against reality — because a plan is a hypothesis about the future, not a promise.
Quick check
3 questions here, of 5 in this lesson’s practice set. Answers stay hidden until you check.
Cascade Coffee's leadership team decides the chain will enter two new states within five years, guided by its mission of serving great coffee in mid-sized cities. Which type of plan is this?
Choose an answer, then check it.
Cascade Coffee's regional managers write the plan that opens six new stores in the northern suburbs this year, choosing sites, assigning store managers, and setting each opening's budget. How does this plan relate to the company's five-year expansion strategy?
Choose an answer, then check it.
Study tools & related lessonsYou’ll learn to · Common mistakes · Easily confused · Key vocabulary · Related
You’ll learn to
- State the working definition of planning, attributed to OpenStax's Principles of Management: planning is the process by which managers establish goals and specify how these goals are to be attained.
- Name three reasons organizations plan — direction, coordination, and efficient use of resources — with one line of explanation for each.
- Distinguish strategic, tactical, and operational plans, each with an original example.
- Describe the planning process in four steps: assess the situation, set objectives, choose actions, and monitor.
- Explain the difference between a goal and a plan — the destination versus the route — noting that goal-setting is covered in its own topic.
- Explain why a plan is a hypothesis about the future and why plans change when conditions change.
Common mistakes
Calling a destination a plan.
An objective without action statements is not a plan. A real plan specifies what will be done, when, how, and by whom — OpenStax's action statements — not just the end state you hope to reach.
Treating the plan as fixed once it is written.
Plans are built on assumptions, and assumptions break. OpenStax stresses that plans must be monitored and administered with flexibility; when conditions change, the plan should change with them.
Planning only at the top.
A strategic plan with no tactical or operational plans behind it never reaches the work. OpenStax describes tactical plans as the unit-level plans that accomplish the strategic plan — the layers have to connect.
Skipping the situation assessment.
Jumping straight to objectives skips the awareness step of the planning process. Managers need the current state — strengths, weaknesses, commitments — before they can set realistic objectives.
Treating the plan as a guarantee.
A plan is a hypothesis about the future, not a promise. The honest framing keeps you alert: when reality disagrees with the plan, reality wins.
Easily confused
Goal vs. Plan
A goal is the destination — the end state the organization hopes to attain. A plan is the route — the action statements specifying what will be done, when, how, and by whom. Goal-setting itself is a sibling topic.
Strategic plan vs. Operational plan
A strategic plan sets the organization's long-term direction and reason for being; an operational plan directs the day-to-day technical core. Tactical plans sit between them, translating strategy into unit-level action.
Key vocabulary
- Planning
- The management function of setting objectives and deciding the course of action to achieve them; the definition used in this lesson comes from OpenStax's Principles of Management.
- Strategic plan
- A long-term plan that positions the whole organization in its environment and is guided by the mission and vision.
- Tactical plan
- A division-level or unit-level plan designed to help the organization accomplish its strategic plan.
- Operational plan
- A plan that directs the day-to-day activities of the organization's technical core, such as schedules and checklists.
- Objectives
- The end states an organization hopes to attain; in OpenStax's terms, outcome or goal statements.
- Action statement
- The part of a plan that specifies what must be done, when, how, and by whom.
- Premises
- The assumptions about the future on which a plan is built; the quality of a plan depends on the quality of its premises.
- Contingency plan
- An alternative course of action prepared for use if the assumptions behind the main plan turn out to be wrong.
- Monitoring
- The ongoing review of results against the plan, so the plan can be adjusted when conditions change.
Sources & references
- Principles of Management, Section 17.1: Is Planning Important? — OpenStax, Rice University
- Principles of Management, Section 17.2: The Planning Process — OpenStax, Rice University
- Principles of Management, Section 17.3: Types of Plans — OpenStax, Rice University
- Strategic Planning — Process, Steps, and Benefits — Corporate Finance Institute (CFI)
- Principles of Management, Section 1.1: What Do Managers Do? — OpenStax, Rice University
- Principles of Management, Section 1.3: Major Characteristics of the Manager's Job — OpenStax, Rice University
EliExplains lessons are original prose written from the open, credible references above. See Copyright & Licensing.
Researched 2026-08-22
Educational content only. It is not medical, legal or professional advice. Found an error? Tell us.