Medical Billing and Coding · Certification reviews
CPC Certification Review
On this page 4 sections
In 30 seconds
An Independent Research Guide
The college version
Before You Start
This page is for anyone researching the CPC credential, including readers who have already bought a course or a set of code books. You do not need any prior lesson to read it. If you have not yet chosen a direction (billing, coding, or an adjacent role), read Start Here: Which Certification Is Right for You? — Recommended first, because this page assumes you have a reason to be looking at a coding credential. If you are unsure what "professional coding" means, read Physician Office vs. Hospital Coding — Recommended, which explains the setting distinction this credential's scope rests on.
Difficulty: Beginner to Intermediate. The research itself is simple. What takes judgment is reading your own foundation gaps honestly, which needs enough orientation to CPT and modifiers to know what you do not yet know. This page also works as a refresher: returning learners and current credential holders use the renewal and "what to verify" sections without reading the whole page.
One outcome this page treats as completely normal: "I need the foundations first." That is not a setback. For most readers it is the correct finding, and it saves money spent testing before you are ready.
What this is and why it matters
This is a research page, not exam preparation and not a recommendation. Its one job is to help you decide whether the CPC credential fits the work and setting you want, and whether you are ready to prepare for it. It does that by explaining what the credential broadly represents, what to build before you study, what to verify with the issuing organization before you pay, and how to check whether local employers actually ask for it.
CPC is the credential many beginners meet first, often through advertising, so it is easy to arrive already committed and under-prepared. Readers frequently discover experience-related realities, allowed-reference rules, or renewal obligations only after paying, and they often try to prepare by memorizing code numbers or copying descriptors from unlicensed online lists. This page exists to send every changing fact back to the issuing organization, to make a foundations-first plan the default, and to set career expectations honestly.
This page now includes the current exam facts — fee, question count, time limit, passing score, allowed references, continuing education, and apprentice status — as verified on the issuer's official site on 2026-08-29 (see Current exam facts, below). Because the issuing organization controls them and can change them, the page also tells you exactly what to re-check and where before you rely on any figure or pay.
What you will be able to do
After reading, you should be able to:
- Describe, in general terms and with the verification caveat, what the CPC credential represents and the kind of work and settings it is associated with.
- Identify the foundation areas to build before exam preparation, and honestly self-assess your gaps in each.
- List the categories of credential facts you must verify on the issuing organization's official site, and explain why a prep provider's summary is not that source.
- Use a public exam content outline, if one is published, for broad study planning only, and explain why it cannot predict questions.
- Recognize common preparation mistakes and name the correct alternative for each.
- Run a local job-posting research method for postings that name CPC, and categorize what they ask for.
- Distinguish passing an exam from being ready for employment, and describe the experience-related realities to research before you count on a job.
The simple version
Think of the CPC credential like a translator's certificate for one language pair. Such a certificate shows that you can translate between two specific languages under test conditions. It does not show that you can translate every language, and the organization that issues it sets its own rules about who may test, which dictionaries you may bring, and what you must do to keep the certificate valid.
The real terms behind the analogy: professional coding is the reporting of services performed by physicians and other qualified professionals; CPT is the procedure-and-service code set used in that reporting, and it is proprietary, meaning access is licensed rather than free; the issuing organization is the body that owns the credential and sets its rules; allowed references are the materials that organization permits during testing; and renewal is what it requires to keep the credential valid over time.
Where the analogy breaks matters. A translator's certificate is not the only way into translation work, and this credential is not the only way into coding work. And the "dictionaries" here are licensed code books whose current edition and permitted use are rules to verify, not general knowledge you can assume. So treat the credential as evidence of one tested skill under one organization's rules, not as a master key.
What the CPC credential broadly represents
The Certified Professional Coder (CPC) is a credential issued by AAPC. The official credential name and issuing organization were verified on the issuer's official site on 2026-08-29 (aapc.com/certifications/cpc). Confirm the current details on the issuer's official site before you rely on them, because organizations occasionally rename credentials and revise descriptions over time.
The issuing organization describes this credential, in general terms, as associated with professional coding — the reporting of services performed by physicians and other qualified professionals — and with the code sets used in that work. Read the credential's scope from the issuer's own current description rather than from any summary, including this one.
Two clarifications prevent the most common misreadings. First, "professional" describes the kind of service being reported (a professional service, as opposed to a facility's own charges), not a level of seniority; a beginner reports professional services just as an experienced coder does. Second, a credential is not a job title and not an employment qualification. It can support your case to an employer, but the employer's own policy and the role's scope decide what is actually required. For the setting distinction underneath all of this, see Physician Office vs. Hospital Coding — Recommended. For definitions of terms used here, see the Glossary — Definition.
This page does not describe exam domains, item difficulty, or whether the credential is required for any particular role — domains and difficulty come from the issuer's official content outline, and whether a credential is required is an employer fact you research. The current exam format and counts, verified 2026-08-29, are in Current exam facts, below.
Who typically researches this credential, and for which settings
Readers who research CPC most usefully tend to be readers aiming at physician-office, clinic, outpatient, and professional-fee coding roles; readers whose local postings name the credential; and readers already working in billing or registration who see it named in internal postings. Settings vary by employer, so treat the patterns below as things to research in your own market, not facts to assume.
Consider two fictional readers. Reader A wants to work in a multi-specialty clinic doing professional-fee coding; for that direction, a professional-coding credential like this one is a reasonable thing to research, and this page continues to apply. Reader B wants to work in hospital inpatient facility coding; that setting leans on a different body of knowledge (including inpatient procedure coding), so Reader B should start with Physician Office vs. Hospital Coding — Recommended to confirm the setting, then look at the CCA Certification Review — Related as the setting-spanning credential this site reviews, and at Official Resources and Study Tools — Official resource for facility-oriented credentials this site does not review. That is a routing decision by fit, not a ranking; neither credential is "better," and which one fits depends on the work and the local market.
Foundations to build first
The most reliable preparation sequence is foundations first, then credential-specific study. Passing depends on reading documentation and reasoning about the code sets, not on memorizing anything. Use the self-check questions below; if you cannot answer one comfortably, that area is a gap to close before you spend money on testing. None of these foundation pages is required to read this page, but each is a prerequisite for real preparation.
| Foundation area | Ask yourself | Where to build it |
|---|---|---|
| Medical terminology | Can I break an unfamiliar term into parts and know when to check a reference? | Medical Terminology — Prerequisite |
| Anatomy | Can I place the major body systems well enough to read where a service happened? | Anatomy for Coders — Prerequisite |
| ICD-10-CM concepts | Can I explain what a diagnosis code set is for and how you search it safely? | ICD-10-CM Basics — Prerequisite |
| CPT concepts | Can I explain, conceptually, what the professional procedure-and-service code set does — without needing any specific code? | CPT Basics — Prerequisite |
| HCPCS Level II concepts | Can I say how HCPCS Level II differs from CPT and why payer variation matters? | HCPCS Level II Basics — Prerequisite |
| Modifiers | Can I explain that a modifier reports a documented circumstance and is never a payment lever? | Modifiers — Prerequisite |
| Documentation and compliance | Can I say what the record must support, and when to pause, verify, and escalate? | HIPAA and Compliance — Prerequisite |
Text alternative: each row names a foundation area, a one-sentence self-check you should be able to answer, and the page that builds it; an area you cannot self-check is a gap to close before exam preparation.
The specifics you will code from — the current CPT concepts and rules, the current diagnosis code set, official guidelines — come from current licensed references and official guidance, not from this page and not from memorized lists. Learn the system here; look the specifics up there.
Current exam facts (verified 2026-08-29 — confirm before you pay)
These were verified on 2026-08-29 on the issuer's official pages (aapc.com/certifications/cpc and AAPC's help center). AAPC controls them and can change them, so confirm each on the official site before you register or pay; the checklist in the next section tells you what to re-check.
| Fact | Verified value (2026-08-29) |
|---|---|
| Exam fee | $399 for one attempt; $499 for two attempts |
| Questions | 100 multiple-choice questions |
| Time limit | 4 hours |
| Delivery | Online at home with a live remote proctor, or at a testing center (USA only) |
| Allowed references (open book) | AMA's CPT Professional Edition, ICD-10-CM, and HCPCS Level II (current year); encoders such as Codify are not permitted |
| Passing score | 70% |
| Continuing education | 36 CEUs every two years |
| Apprentice status (CPC-A) | An apprentice designation applies until the experience requirement is met; AAPC's Practicode program is a stated way to remove it. The exact experience requirement (years) is not published on the public page — confirm it with AAPC. |
What to verify with the issuing organization before you pay
Before you register or buy anything, confirm every item below on the issuing organization's official site. This page deliberately does not fill in the answers, because each one is set by the organization and changes. Take this checklist to the official site as a research task.
| Verify this category | Why it can cost you if it is stale |
|---|---|
| Eligibility and recommended preparation | Requirements and recommendations change; a prep page may show an old version |
| Whether an entry-level or apprentice-style designation exists, what it means, and how it is removed | This affects how you present yourself to employers after passing |
| Membership requirements or bundling | Whether membership is required, optional, or bundled affects total cost |
| Exam delivery options and scheduling | How and where you can test changes |
| Allowed references and which editions | Editions matter; the book on your shelf may not be permitted |
| Retake policy | What happens if you do not pass the first time |
| Fees, by category | Exam, membership, and other charges are set by the organization |
| Renewal cycle and continuing-education requirements | These are ongoing obligations, not one-time costs |
| Code of conduct | Rules you agree to as a candidate and holder |
| Trademark usage rules for the credential name | How you may and may not display the credential |
Text alternative: a two-column checklist pairing each credential fact to verify with the reason a stale answer can cost you; the article never states the current answers.
Verify Before You Pay: Before registering or buying, confirm the current credential name, issuing organization, official portal, fees, and policies on the issuing organization's official site.
Using a public exam content outline correctly
If the issuing organization publishes a public exam content outline for this credential, use it for one thing only: broad study planning. An outline names general areas the exam covers. It does not predict questions, and any source that claims to reproduce, recall, or "match" the actual exam is a red flag to avoid — reproduced exam content is both against the rules and unsafe to rely on.
Concretely, if such an outline exists, link to it from the issuer and cross-check your foundation self-checks — CPT concepts, modifiers, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II — against its broad areas to find where to study more. Do not treat the outline's areas as a question list, and do not expect this page to restate its areas or any weighting; read those from the issuer.
Preparation mistakes and their alternatives
Most wasted preparation comes from a small set of avoidable mistakes. Each has a better alternative.
| Common mistake | Do this instead |
|---|---|
| Memorizing code numbers | Learn how to find and support a code using the system; specifics come from a current licensed reference |
| Copying descriptors from unlicensed online lists | Use a current licensed reference; copied descriptor text is an intellectual-property problem and often wrong |
| Studying a prep provider's summary as if it were the rules | Read eligibility, references, and fees from the issuing organization's official page |
| Skipping anatomy and terminology | Build the reading foundation first; it is the skill the exam actually tests |
| Treating practice scores as readiness | Use practice to find weak concepts, not to predict a result |
| Not checking allowed references and delivery rules | Verify both before you buy books or schedule |
| Assuming an old code-book edition is fine | Confirm the current edition and that it is permitted; code sets change |
| Studying modifiers as payment tools | Learn modifiers as reporting of documented circumstances, never as levers to change payment |
Text alternative: each row pairs a preparation mistake with the corrected approach; the corrections center on learning the system, using current licensed references, and verifying rules with the issuer.
A short worked example. A fictional reader, Coder B, starts with a plan to "memorize 500 codes this month." Revised, that plan becomes: learn how the code sets are organized and how to search them; practice reasoning from fictional documentation with a current licensed reference open; and verify the allowed-reference and delivery rules before scheduling. The revised plan builds the skill the exam tests instead of a list that goes stale with the next edition. To rebuild the underlying concepts, see CPT Basics — Remediation and Modifiers — Remediation.
Study progression (conceptual)
A workable order, without any timeline presented as universal:
- Build the foundations (terminology, anatomy, the code-set concepts, modifiers, documentation and compliance).
- Compare the concepts until the distinctions are solid (diagnosis vs. procedure; code vs. modifier; professional vs. facility; CPT vs. HCPCS Level II).
- Practice guided lookups with a current licensed reference, so finding and supporting a code becomes routine.
- Do original practice with remediation — using practice to locate weak spots, not to predict a score.
- Verify the issuer's current rules (eligibility, references, delivery, fees, renewal).
- Decide whether to schedule.
Text alternative: a six-step conceptual progression from foundations, through concept comparison and guided lookups, to original practice, rule verification, and a scheduling decision; the steps are an order, not a schedule.
Instead of a universal timetable, take a time inventory: how many hours a week you can study, and how solid each foundation already is. Two readers with different starting points will need very different amounts of time, and neither number is a promise.
Career-fit questions and job-posting research
Before you count on this credential opening a door, find out what your local market actually asks for. A simple method: gather about twenty current postings that name CPC or say "CPC or equivalent," and for each one record whether the credential is required or preferred, how much experience is asked for, the setting, the software named, and whether it is on-site, hybrid, or remote. Patterns across twenty postings tell you more than any single ad.
A fictional tally (invented, for method only) might show that most postings list the credential as preferred rather than required, that many ask for some months of experience, and that remote roles exist but rarely for people with no experience. Treat any such tally as a demonstration of the method, not a claim about your market — run your own.
Two honest points about outcomes. What is possible is not the same as what is typical: remote coding roles exist, but they are commonly not entry-level. And no research method guarantees a job. If a posting or an advertisement pairs this credential with a promise of guaranteed placement or requires paid "training" to be hired, treat that as a warning sign; see Entry-Level Job Reality — Career connection. For ways to build the experience postings ask for, the entry-level page and adjacent-role paths are the place to look.
Renewal, continuing education, and maintenance
Credentials of this kind are maintained over time, not earned once and forgotten. A renewal cycle and continuing-education requirements exist, and they are set and controlled by the issuing organization. What the cycle is, what counts, and how reinstatement works if a credential lapses are all issuer rules to verify — not facts this page states.
Stop and Verify: This detail can depend on a current rule, code year, payer, employer, setting, or document. Check the controlling official source and the applicable policy before acting.
To be clear about this resource: it supports continuing learning and refreshers. It does not provide continuing-education credit, credential-renewal credit, or accredited training of any kind, and nothing you do here counts toward an issuer's requirements.
Cost categories
Budget by category rather than by any number, because the numbers are set by the organization and its vendors and change. The categories to expect and verify: the exam itself; any required or bundled membership; licensed references and code books; study materials; retakes; renewal; continuing education; and logistics such as travel or a testing environment. Confirm each on the official site before you commit.
Verify Before You Pay: Before registering or buying, confirm the current credential name, issuing organization, official portal, fees, and policies on the issuing organization's official site.
Understand, memorize, look up, verify
| Use this approach | What belongs here |
|---|---|
| Understand | What professional coding is; why foundations come before exam preparation; why a content outline is a planning tool, not a question predictor; why passing an exam differs from being ready for a job. |
| Memorize carefully | The foundation areas and their self-check questions; the verification checklist categories; the preparation-mistake list. |
| Look up | The current credential name and issuing organization; your local posting language; which licensed references exist for study. |
| Verify officially | Eligibility, designations, membership, delivery, allowed references and editions, retakes, fees, renewal, and continuing-education requirements — with the issuing organization, immediately before acting. |
Text alternative: four approaches sorted by how stable the information is — concepts to understand, short lists to memorize, market and reference facts to look up, and issuer rules to verify officially before acting.
Common misconceptions
| Belief | Why it is tempting | Why it matters | The correction |
|---|---|---|---|
| "CPC qualifies me to code in any setting." | Marketing calls it the coding credential, and ads say "coding certification." | Readers aiming at facility inpatient work may prepare for the wrong body of knowledge and misread postings. | The credential is associated with professional coding; facility inpatient coding leans elsewhere. Compare with Physician Office vs. Hospital Coding — Recommended and the CCA Certification Review — Related. |
| "Preparation means memorizing codes." | Flashcard products and forum tips emphasize code numbers. | Memorized numbers go stale each edition and build no documentation reasoning; copying descriptors is an IP problem. | Learn the system and practice with a current licensed reference; see the preparation-mistakes table and CPT Basics — Remediation. |
| "Once I pass, I am a working coder." | The credential's name sounds like a job title. | Experience-related realities and employer expectations arrive after you pay, and readers stall. | A credential is not an employment qualification; verify any entry-level or apprentice-style designation and see Entry-Level Job Reality — Career connection. |
| "The prep provider knows the current rules." | Prep pages display eligibility and fees prominently. | Eligibility, delivery, references, and fees change; a stale summary costs money. | Read every changing fact from the issuer; use the Verify Before You Pay checklist above. |
| "This site's practice questions match the exam." | Many sites claim exam alignment. | It builds false confidence and can expose you to leaked material elsewhere. | Practice here is original and conceptual, not exam content; see CPC-Style Questions — Related. |
| "Any code-book edition works." | Used books are cheap and look identical. | Code sets change and allowed references for testing are issuer rules. | Confirm the current edition and that it is permitted; see ICD-10-CM Basics — Remediation. |
Text alternative: each row states a common belief, why it is tempting, why it matters, and the correction with the page that fixes it; the corrections route to the setting page, the foundations, the entry-level reality page, and the issuer's own rules.
Check yourself
- Name the foundation areas to build before exam preparation.
- From category prompts, reconstruct the Verify Before You Pay checklist.
- Explain professional coding versus facility coding in two sentences.
- Say what is wrong with a "memorize 500 codes" study plan.
- Given four sources about allowed references — the issuer's current page, a prep summary, a two-year-old forum thread, and a video comment — say which one controls and why.
- Put the conceptual study progression in order.
Teach it back: explain to a coworker who wants to "get the CPC next month" what to check first. Include one distinction (professional vs. facility fit), one professional-context point (foundation gaps to close), and one thing to verify with the issuer. There is no model answer; the point is that you can walk it through.
Ready to move on?
- I can explain what professional coding is and why this credential's scope must be read from the official page.
- I know which foundations I still need and where they are on this site.
- I have a Verify Before You Pay checklist and know where to take it.
- I know why practice here is not exam content and why code memorization is the wrong plan.
- I know what I will do after passing, and that passing is not employment.
This page does not verify any organization's current rules, does not prepare anyone for an exam, and does not qualify anyone for a job.
If you got something wrong
| Mistake | Review | Try again |
|---|---|---|
| Confused professional and facility coding | Physician Office vs. Hospital Coding — Remediation and its setting comparison | In a later session, classify which setting a fictional posting describes. |
| Unsure what CPT or a modifier is for | CPT Basics and Modifiers — Remediation | In a later session, compare a code and a modifier in your own words. |
| Trusted a prep page, forum, or old book | the "Check the source yourself" challenge below | In a later session, choose the controlling source before acting. |
| Assumed passing means employment | Entry-Level Job Reality — Career connection | In a later session, separate possible, typical, and guaranteed in a posting. |
| Assumed old rules or an old edition still apply | this page's verification checklist and the issuer's current page | In a later session, list the categories you would re-verify. |
If two ideas stay tangled, put them side by side and compare before more practice. If you leaned on an outdated or non-authoritative source, work the source challenge before continuing.
In the profession
Professional coding roles appear in physician practices, multi-specialty clinics, outpatient departments, billing companies, and payer organizations, under titles such as coder, coding specialist, professional-fee coder, and coding analyst. Some employers name this credential for coding roles; others accept "or equivalent" or hire uncertified candidates into adjacent roles. What a real role requires is controlled by employer policy, the role's scope, and the issuing organization's current rules — not by the credential's name.
In certification
This page is the research hub for one credential; it does not align to any exam and does not predict questions. If a public exam content outline exists, it is for broad planning only. To compare credentials by fit rather than rank, see the CCA Certification Review and CBCS Certification Review — Related, and, if you have not chosen a direction, Which Certification Is Right for You? — Recommended. Practice on this site is original and conceptual; see CPC-Style Questions — Certification connection, which is a next step only after your foundations are solid.
In careers
Postings phrase this credential in different ways — required, preferred, or "or equivalent" — and often pair it with an experience expectation. For a career changer, transferable strengths (attention to detail, reading dense documents, process discipline) map to what postings ask for, but they do not replace healthcare-specific foundations, and no employment outcome is implied. Start with Entry-Level Job Reality — Career connection and Physician Office vs. Hospital Coding — Recommended.
For continuing learning
Returning learners and current credential holders use this page to identify what to re-verify (renewal cycle, continuing-education requirements, reinstatement) and which foundation pages to refresh for what has changed (code years, guideline versions). A six-month return usually means re-verifying renewal rules and refreshing modifiers and CPT concepts; a years-away return means the foundations in order, then this page, then the issuer's current page. This resource provides no approved continuing-education or renewal credit.
Study options
- 5-Minute Review: the credential's general scope (with the verification caveat) and the Verify Before You Pay checklist.
- 15-Minute Study: the foundation self-check plus the preparation-mistakes section.
- Full Lesson: every section, including content-outline use, posting research, renewal, and cost categories.
- Refresher or Deep Dive: the renewal and "what to verify" sections for returning learners; reading local labor data with its limitations as optional deeper work.
None of these plans is the optimal one; use the short review when time is tight and a fuller pass when a section keeps tripping you up.
If you remember only five things: the credential is associated with professional coding, and the official page controls that scope; build foundations first; verify every changing fact with the issuer before you pay; a content outline is not the exam; and passing is not the same as being employed.
Check the source yourself
Not every page that mentions this credential controls what is true about it. The issuing organization's own current page controls its rules. A prep provider's page may summarize those rules but does not control them and can be out of date. A forum thread or a video comment may raise a good question but controls nothing. When two sources disagree, the higher-authority, more current one wins — and for credential rules, that is the issuer.
Freshness note: credential facts (eligibility, references, fees, renewal) are periodically updated and must be re-verified; the credential's general scope is more stable but is still attributed to the issuer and re-checked; local posting language is context-dependent and varies by employer and market.
Source challenge: you want to know whether the entry-level or apprentice-style designation you remember still exists and how it is removed. You have four sources: the issuing organization's current page, a prep provider's summary, a two-year-old forum thread, and a comment under a video. Which one controls the answer you can act on, which are acceptable only to raise questions, and what remains for you to verify directly? Point yourself to Official Resources and Study Tools — Official resource for where to look.
Frequently asked questions
What does CPC stand for and who issues it?
CPC stands for Certified Professional Coder, a credential issued by AAPC. Confirm the current official credential name and issuing-organization name on the official site before relying on either; names and descriptions change.
Do I need experience to sit for the exam?
That is an eligibility question, and eligibility — including whether an entry-level or apprentice-style designation applies to candidates without experience — is set by the issuing organization and changes. Verify it on the official site rather than from any summary.
Can I prepare without a course?
Preparation is possible without a specific course: build the foundations, study the concepts, and practice with a current licensed reference. What you cannot skip is verifying the issuer's allowed-reference and delivery rules before you buy books or schedule. This page does not endorse or rule out any provider.
What happens after I pass?
Passing shows one tested skill; it is not a job. Research the experience-related realities in your market, look at adjacent roles that build experience, and verify how any entry-level or apprentice-style designation is described and removed. See Entry-Level Job Reality — Career connection.
Is CPC worth it?
That depends on your direction, your local postings, and your readiness — it is not a verdict this page can give. Use the gateway decision framework in Which Certification Is Right for You? — Recommended and your own posting research to decide.
Does this site's practice match the exam?
No. Practice on this site is original and conceptual, built to exercise the underlying concepts, not to reproduce or predict exam content. Any source claiming to match the real exam is a red flag.
Where to go next
- Recommended next: CPT Basics — Next lesson if you have any foundation gap; otherwise CPC-Style Questions — Next lesson.
- If you struggled: Physician Office vs. Hospital Coding — Remediation, then return here.
- If you already know this: take the Verify Before You Pay checklist to the issuing organization's official page (Verify Before You Pay), then move to practice.
- If your goal is billing: CBCS Certification Review — Related and Medical Biller vs. Medical Coder — Career connection.
- If your goal is coding: continue here, then Modifiers — Next lesson.
Sources to verify before relying on this page
- AAPC official CPC credential pages (confirm the current credential name and issuing organization) — control the scope description, eligibility, entry-level or apprentice-style designation, membership, delivery, allowed references and editions, retakes, fees, renewal, continuing-education requirements, code of conduct, and trademark usage.
- AMA CPT information (licensed) — supports only the statement that CPT is proprietary and the pointer to current licensed references; no descriptor text is reproduced here.
- CMS and CDC/NCHS official coding resources — support the code-year and guideline-version awareness referenced in the foundations section.
- Current local job postings (your own sample) — the posting-research method only; they describe your market, not a promise.
- Public labor data (BLS) — only if a reviewed version cites it, with full data-citation fields and no conversion into any promise.
Study tools & related lessonsRelated
Sources & references
This lesson was adapted from the open educational references above; their licenses and attributions are preserved. See Copyright & Licensing.
Educational content only. It is not medical, legal or professional advice. Found an error? Tell us.