Religious Studies · Foundations
Secularism
On this page 9 sections
In 30 seconds
secularism A contested concept with two main senses: a political principle separating religion from the state, and a claim about the decline or privatization of religion in modern life. Full entry → is a contested concept, not a single settled idea. In one sense it is political: the principle that the state should be separate from religion and stay neutral toward religious traditions, as in France's laicite The French form of political secularism, grounded in the 1905 Law of the Separation of Church and State, which treats religion as a private matter and public space as nonreligious. Full entry → or the U.S. First Amendment. In another sense it is social: the claim, associated with thinkers such as Marx, Weber, and Durkheim, that modernization weakens religion's social significance — a claim scholars still debate. Secularism is not the same as atheism A belief position holding that no god or gods exist; named here only to distinguish it from secularism, which concerns religion's place in society and politics. Full entry →.
Why this matters
Secularism appears constantly in news coverage, law, and scholarship — from school-prayer rulings in the United States to France's restrictions on religious symbols — yet the word carries several different meanings. Learning to separate the political sense (the state's neutrality toward religion) from the social sense (claims about religion's decline) is a basic analytical skill. Because the concept is contested, students who can say who defines it, how, and what the scholarly debates around it are, can read arguments about religion and public life carefully instead of repeating slogans. This lesson also connects directly to siblings on religious diversity, religion and politics, and interfaith relations.
The college version
One word, several meanings
Secularism is a contested concept: scholars use the word in several distinct ways. The Canadian philosopher Charles Taylor has observed that it is not entirely clear what is meant by secularism, since quite different formulae go under the name. In political contexts, secularism refers to the policies through which a state relates to religion — most often the principle that the state stays separate from religion and neutral toward religious traditions. In a broader sense, it can mean a worldview that treats religion as one part of human life, not its foundation. Related words tangle easily: the secular The realm of human affairs understood as outside religion, especially as a modern way of organizing life, knowledge, and institutions. Full entry → is the realm of affairs outside religion, secularization The historical process in which religious belief and practice decline in social significance, as described by scholars of religious change. Full entry → is the process in which religious belief and practice decline, and secularism is the principle built around those ideas. Even scholars find a precise definition difficult, so this lesson maps the senses and debates instead.
The secularization thesis and the debate over it
One influential scholarly claim, the secularization thesis The scholarly claim, associated with thinkers such as Marx, Weber, Durkheim, and Freud, that modernization reduces religion's social significance; its accuracy is debated. Full entry →, holds that modernization reduces religion's social significance. OpenStax's sociology textbook attributes the expectation to sociologists Emile Durkheim, Max Weber, and Karl Marx and to Sigmund Freud, who expected modernization to decrease religion's influence. American sociologist Peter Berger used the term in 1967 to describe this societal shift away from religion. Berger later recanted, arguing that religion remained a dynamic force and that religious pluralism, not decline, defined the modern era. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy notes that this prediction has not been borne out: the mix of democracy, religious diversity, and religious criticism has not produced religion's disappearance or privatization. Survey evidence is mixed: 65 percent of U.S. adults in a 2009 Gallup survey called religion important in their daily lives, versus lower figures in several European countries, while U.S. adults with no religious affiliation rose from 17 percent in 2009 to 26 percent in 2019, per Pew. Charles Taylor's A Secular Age (2007) reframes the change as a shift in the conditions of belief — destabilization and recomposition — not religion's disappearance.
Varieties of political secularism
political secularism The principle that the state should be separate from religion and remain neutral toward religious traditions, institutionalized differently across countries. Full entry → is not one arrangement but a family of them. In the United States, the First Amendment provides that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. These clauses allow free religious practice in a pluralistic society and guarantee that the government will not promote one religion over another. Thomas Jefferson described them in his 1802 letter to the Danbury Baptists as building a wall of separation between church and state. In France, laicite — often translated as secularism, better rendered as the lay principle — rests on the 1905 Law of the Separation of Church and State, whose first article guarantees freedom of conscience and the free exercise of religions subject to restrictions made in the interest of public order. Laicite treats religion as a private matter and public space as nonreligious; a 2004 law prohibited conspicuous religious signs in public schools. Turkey's laiklik, modeled on the French example, was built through Mustafa Kemal Ataturk's reforms after the republic's founding in 1923 — the caliphate abolished in 1924, Islam dropped as state religion in 1928 — and laiklik was written into the constitution in 1937; Ahmet Kuru calls it 'assertive secularism.' In India, Gandhi's sarva dharma sama bhava (all religions have the same essence) and Nehru's dharma nirapeksha (neutrality toward religion) framed competing visions; the word secular entered the preamble only in 1976.
Secularism and religious freedom
Scholars often frame the separation of religion and state as protection for both religion and the state, not hostility to religion. John Locke's A Letter Concerning Toleration (1689) advocated firm separation between the personal matter of religion and the political world of the state, and his work greatly influenced modern political secularism. The U.S. clauses allow free religious practice while guaranteeing that the government will not promote one religion over another, and France's 1905 law opens by declaring that the republic ensures freedom of conscience. Separation, on this account, protects religious freedom while keeping the state free of religious control — though scholars disagree about whether any arrangement achieves neutrality.
Critiques of secularism
Secularism has scholarly critics on several fronts. Postcolonial scholars argue that secularism is not a neutral framework. The anthropologist Talal Asad wrote that laicite, like other modes of secularism, is a modern form of political rule that seeks to define a particular kind of secular subject who demonstrates loyalty to the state through the right conventional signs. Sociologist Nilufer Gole has argued that freely chosen veiling unsettles secular interpretations of women's emancipation. Others tie the concept's genealogy to the West: the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy reports that New Traditionalist critics such as John Milbank and Alasdair MacIntyre trace secularism's rise to developments in Western intellectual history. In India, groups across the political spectrum call themselves the true secularists and label opponents pseudo-secular — evidence that the term's meaning is contested in practice.
Secularity, secularism, and atheism
Two everyday confusions are worth clearing. First, secularity and secularism differ: secularity describes a condition — a society, institution, or frame of mind in which religion is not the organizing principle — while secularism is a principle or worldview that people affirm. Second, secularism is not atheism. Britannica notes that secularism, understood as a worldview that treats religion as peripheral rather than primary for understanding and ethics, encapsulates but is not identical to atheism; George Holyoake coined the term in 1851 for a nonreligious civic and ethical philosophy distinct from atheism's connotations. A secular state can be full of religious people, and an atheist can live in a state closely tied to religion. The terms answer different questions: one about belief in God, the other about religion's place in society and politics.

Eli explains
The same idea, in plain words
Explain it like I’m 10
Think of secularism as two different questions wearing the same coat. The first question is about rules: should the government and religion be in charge of each other? Political secularism answers that they should not — the state keeps its distance and stays neutral, as in France's laicite or the U.S. First Amendment. The second question is about influence: is religion actually fading from modern life? The secularization thesis says yes — that as societies modernize, religion matters less. Many scholars once took that for granted, but today it is a live debate: some countries show decline, others show religion staying strong or even growing, and one of the theory's best-known champions, Peter Berger, changed his mind. So when you hear the word secularism, ask which question is being asked: the one about how the state should treat religion, or the one about whether religion is disappearing. The coat is shared, but the questions are different.
Picture it like this
Secularism's two senses are like the two meanings of a closed sign on a shop. Political secularism is the shopkeeper's rule about the door: the shop (the state) runs its own business without the church (religion) at the register, and without endorsing any customer's faith. Social secularism is the claim that the shop is getting emptier over time — fewer customers, less influence. One is a rule about boundaries; the other is a claim about crowds.
Where the picture stops working
The shop analogy breaks down because religion is not a customer who can be asked to leave, and the boundary between state and religion is drawn differently — and contested — in every country. Some shops are emptier, some fuller, and people keep renegotiating where the door is. A rule about separation also says nothing about how religious the people inside actually are.
Worked example
A student writing a short paper on religious symbols in public schools compares the United States and France. For the United States, she finds that the Supreme Court ruled in Engel v. Vitale (1962) that a voluntary, nondenominational prayer recited in public schools violated the establishment clause. For France, she finds that a 2004 law prohibited students from wearing conspicuous religious signs, including large crosses, yarmulkes, and hijabs. She describes both as forms of political secularism — separation of religion and state — while noting how they differ: the U.S. model protects free exercise alongside non-establishment, while laicite treats religion as a private matter. She reports the arguments of the laws' defenders and critics as attributed positions rather than endorsing either side.
Key takeaway
Secularism is a contested concept: it names both a political principle separating religion from the state and a disputed claim about religion's decline, and neither its meaning nor its consequences are settled.
Quick check
3 questions here, of 5 in this lesson’s practice set. Answers stay hidden until you check.
A scholar argues that as societies modernize, religion's influence over public life declines. Which concept is the scholar invoking?
A country's 1905 law guarantees freedom of conscience and free exercise of religion subject to restrictions made in the interest of public order, and public institutions treat religion as a private matter. Which model of political secularism does this describe?
Study tools & related lessonsYou’ll learn to · Common mistakes · Easily confused · Key vocabulary · Related
You’ll learn to
- Define secularism and explain why scholars treat it as a contested concept with more than one sense.
- Distinguish political secularism (separation of religion and state) from social secularism (claims about religion's decline).
- Describe the secularization thesis, attribute it to its classic proponents and critics, and explain why its accuracy is debated.
- Compare varieties of political secularism, including laicite in France and the First Amendment model in the United States.
- Explain how scholars frame separation as protection for both religion and the state, and summarize attributed critiques of secularism as a Western, non-neutral concept.
- Distinguish secularism from atheism, and secularity from secularism.
Common mistakes
Treating secularism and atheism as the same thing.
They answer different questions: atheism is a position about whether God exists, while secularism concerns the place of religion in society and politics; Britannica notes secularism is not identical to atheism.
Presenting the secularization thesis as established fact.
It is an influential claim attributed to Marx, Weber, Durkheim, and Freud, but it is contested — Berger recanted, and religion remains publicly significant in many modern societies.
Assuming all political secularism works the same way.
Laicite, the U.S. First Amendment model, and Turkey's laiklik are distinct arrangements with different histories, laws, and boundaries.
Reading a secular state as an anti-religious state.
Separation is commonly framed as protecting religious freedom: the First Amendment's clauses allow free practice, and France's 1905 law guarantees freedom of conscience.
Using secular as a synonym for modern or progressive.
The secular is a scholarly category describing the realm outside religion; treating secularism as progress — or as decline — is itself one side of a contested debate.
Easily confused
Political secularism vs. Social secularism (secularization)
A principle about how the state relates to religion versus a claim about religion's declining social significance.
Laicite vs. U.S. First Amendment model
France treats religion as private and public space as nonreligious; the United States bars establishment and protects free exercise, leaving religion visible in public life.
Secularism vs. Atheism
A concept about religion's place in society and politics versus a belief position about the existence of God; the two are not the same.
Secularity vs. Secularism
A descriptive condition of a society or institution versus a principle or worldview that people affirm.
Key vocabulary
- secularism
- A contested concept with two main senses: a political principle separating religion from the state, and a claim about the decline or privatization of religion in modern life.
- political secularism
- The principle that the state should be separate from religion and remain neutral toward religious traditions, institutionalized differently across countries.
- secularization
- The historical process in which religious belief and practice decline in social significance, as described by scholars of religious change.
- secularization thesis
- The scholarly claim, associated with thinkers such as Marx, Weber, Durkheim, and Freud, that modernization reduces religion's social significance; its accuracy is debated.
- laicite
- The French form of political secularism, grounded in the 1905 Law of the Separation of Church and State, which treats religion as a private matter and public space as nonreligious.
- establishment clause
- The First Amendment clause stating that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, a cornerstone of the U.S. model of separation.
- free exercise clause
- The First Amendment clause prohibiting laws that bar the free exercise of religion, paired with the establishment clause in the U.S. arrangement.
- the secular
- The realm of human affairs understood as outside religion, especially as a modern way of organizing life, knowledge, and institutions.
- atheism
- A belief position holding that no god or gods exist; named here only to distinguish it from secularism, which concerns religion's place in society and politics.
Sources & references
- Religion and Political Theory — Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University
- Secularism — Encyclopaedia Britannica — Encyclopaedia Britannica
- 15.3 Religion in the United States — Introduction to Sociology 3e — OpenStax, Rice University
- Church and State — Encyclopaedia Britannica
EliExplains lessons are original prose written from the open, credible references above. See Copyright & Licensing.
Researched 2026-08-21
Educational content only. It is not medical, legal or professional advice. Found an error? Tell us.

