In sociology, what is social control?
Choose an answer, then check it.
Sociology · Foundations
Social Control
On this page 9 sections
In 30 seconds
social control The regulation and enforcement of norms — the mechanisms a society uses to encourage conformity and maintain order. Full entry → is the regulation and enforcement of norms — the mechanisms that keep people conforming, from a raised eyebrow to a parking ticket. Sociologists split it into internal control, self-regulation through norms we have absorbed, and external control, pressure from other people and systems. Its tools are sanctions: rewards for conforming and punishments for violating. Every society practices it, and it quietly holds daily life together — though, like any powerful force, it can be applied unevenly.
Why this matters
Academically, social control anchors sociology: the internal–external split, informal versus formal sanctions, and the link to socialization reappear in every course on culture, deviance, and crime. Practically, it explains everyday puzzles — why one glance silences a loud phone call, why a fine changes driving habits, why most people follow rules with nobody watching. It matters forward-looking, too: understanding how order is produced lets you see both the value of shared rules and the real risk that control gets used carelessly. Spotting which kind of control is at work — inside you or outside you, from people or from systems — is a skill for every group, workplace, and community you will ever join.
The college version
What social control is
Social control is the regulation and enforcement of norms — the full set of mechanisms that encourage people to conform to the expectations of their groups (OpenStax, Introduction to Sociology 3e, section 7.1, and Ch. 7 Key Terms). Its underlying goal is to maintain social order An arrangement of practices and behaviors on which a society's members base their daily lives. Full entry →, which OpenStax's key terms define as an arrangement of practices and behaviors on which society's members base their daily lives. OpenStax puts the scope plainly: all societies practice social control. Original example: on a packed subway car, riders face inward, hold the pole, and keep their voices low — no announcement requires any of it, yet nearly everyone complies. That compliance is social control at work; the calm, predictable ride is the social order it protects. Notice what the definition does not say: it does not say laws. Laws are one instrument of control, not the whole machinery.
Internal and external control
Sociologists distinguish two directions from which control can come. internal social control Self-regulation: conformity that comes from norms a person has internalized, so it operates with no outside pressure. Full entry → is self-regulation: norms a person has absorbed so deeply that following them needs no outside push. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy's entry on social norms describes the mechanism: through socialization, people internalize norms, and once internalization succeeds they typically feel guilt or shame at the prospect of behaving in a deviant way — external sanctions are no longer needed. OpenStax makes the same point from the other side: social control works so well that most people conform regardless of whether authority figures such as law enforcement are present. Original example: Priya finds a wallet on a hiking trail, sees cash and no owner nearby, and walks it to the ranger station — not because anyone is watching, but because keeping it would sit badly with her. external social control Conformity produced by pressure from outside the person — reactions, rewards, punishments, or systems of enforcement. Full entry → is the opposite: pressure applied from outside the person. Original example: Marcus drives a little slower for the half mile where a patrol car usually parks, though he speeds everywhere else. Same conformity to the speed limit — a different engine. Internal control runs on conviction; external control runs on consequences.
Informal and formal control, and the four kinds of sanctions
The means of enforcing rules are sanctions — rewards and punishments (OpenStax 7.1). Informal sanctions arise in face-to-face interactions: a smile, a sigh, a pointed glance, a muttered comment. Formal sanctions are officially recognized and enforced by organizations — a written warning, a fine, an expulsion (OpenStax 7.1; Ch. 7 Key Terms). Original example: when Rafael parks his scooter across a sidewalk, a passerby frowns and tells him to move it — an informal sanction A sanction that occurs in face-to-face interaction, such as a smile or a disapproving glance. Full entry →. When the parking officer later issues him a ticket, that is a formal sanction A sanction that is officially recognized and enforced by an organization or institution. Full entry →. The same act drew both. Sanctions also split by direction. Positive sanctions are rewards for conforming: praise, a bonus, an official commendation. Negative sanctions are punishments for violating: a scolding, a fine, a suspension (OpenStax 3.2; 7.1). The two splits combine into four types. Original example: a student who organizes a study group gets thanks from classmates (positive, informal); one who plays loud music in the dorm at 2 a.m. gets a knock on the wall (negative, informal); a lifeguard who performs a rescue receives a written commendation from the city (positive, formal); a driver who ignores a school-zone sign receives a ticket (negative, formal). Laws and police sit at the formal end, stated simply: a law is a written rule a society has established, and police are the institution that enforces many such rules.
Socialization as control, and two honest notes
One more route matters: socialization. People learn norms and internalize them through a process of socialization that starts in infancy — which is how social control gets installed inside us (SEP, Social Norms). In plain terms: we learn to police ourselves. The full story of that learning belongs to the sibling topic socialization; here, one line is enough — the same process that teaches a child table manners also teaches the adult to return a lost wallet. The honest note: control can overreach. Formal control is made and applied by people, so it can be uneven, and it can target behavior most people do not consider harmful. OpenStax's example: for decades, low-stakes gambling — behavior most people viewed as ordinary — was criminal in many U.S. states, so otherwise law-abiding people were breaking the law. The same section observes that enforcement does not always match the perceived harm of an act. These are observations, not policy judgments: sociologists describe how control works, and part of that description is that it is imperfect. The honest framing: social control is the gravity of social life. It is the quiet force that keeps millions of daily interactions predictable — the reason a checkout line holds, a handshake closes a deal, and a library stays quiet. You feel it most when it fails.
Eli explains
The same idea, in plain words
Explain it like I’m 10
Social control is how groups keep people following the rules. It runs on two engines. The inside engine is self-regulation: you do not drop litter on a clean street, not because a camera is watching, but because it would feel wrong. The outside engine is pressure: a stranger's glare, a parent's scolding, a ticket from an officer. Sanctions are the fuel of the outside engine — rewards for playing along, punishments for breaking ranks. You build the inside engine as you grow up, absorbing norms from the people around you; that is socialization. Every society runs on both engines at once, and most of the time they run so quietly that you never notice them. You notice when someone breaks a rule and the whole room reacts — that reaction is social control showing itself.
Picture it like this
Think of social control as the gravity of social life. Gravity holds you to the ground; social control holds people to shared expectations. You never think about gravity until you jump, and you never think about social control until someone breaks a rule — then you feel the pull. Gravity also pulls from two directions at once: your own weight presses you down, and the ground pushes back. In the same way, you stay in line partly because of what you believe and partly because of what others will do if you do not.
Where the picture stops working
Gravity is uniform and impersonal: it pulls the same on everyone and never cares about fairness, history, or circumstances. Social control is none of those things. It is made by people, learned differently in different groups, applied unevenly, and open to question and change. Gravity never overreaches; social control sometimes does. And unlike gravity, social control can be redesigned — which is exactly why it deserves scrutiny.
Worked example
Devon, a first-year student, likes his music loud. The first week, his roommate sighs and says, “Hey, headphones?” — an informal negative sanction from a person. Devon turns it down for a night, then forgets. A neighbor knocks on the wall; the floor group chat goes quiet when he enters — more informal pressure. When a second complaint reaches the resident assistant, Devon gets a written reminder about quiet hours, the dorm's formal rules beginning to engage. After a third complaint, housing issues a fine under the student code: a formal negative sanction, enforced by the institution. Meanwhile his classmate Tessa, who lives in a single room, never plays music loudly even at 2 a.m. with no one to hear — internal control, because the norm is inside her, not outside. Devon's semester shows all four sanction types and both directions of control; Tessa shows what happens when control has been internalized.
Key takeaway
Social control is the regulation and enforcement of norms, powered by internal self-regulation and external pressure and delivered through positive and negative, informal and formal sanctions. It holds social life together — and, being made by people, it deserves the same scrutiny as any powerful force.
Quick check
3 questions here, of 5 in this lesson’s practice set. Answers stay hidden until you check.
Nadia finds a wallet on an empty bus seat. No one sees her, there is no camera, and she could easily keep the cash. She turns it in to the driver anyway because keeping it would make her feel dishonest. Which kind of social control is this?
Choose an answer, then check it.
Rafael parks his scooter across a sidewalk. A passerby frowns and tells him to move it; later, a parking officer issues him a ticket. How do sociologists classify the two reactions?
Choose an answer, then check it.
Study tools & related lessonsYou’ll learn to · Common mistakes · Easily confused · Key vocabulary · Related
You’ll learn to
- Define social control using the working definition: the regulation and enforcement of norms.
- Distinguish internal from external social control, using an original example of each.
- Distinguish informal from formal sanctions, using an original example of each.
- Explain how positive and negative sanctions each encourage conformity, with an example of each.
- Analyze how social control maintains order while also being applied unevenly.
Common mistakes
“Social control is just laws and police.”
Laws and police are only the formal tip. Most control is informal (a frown, a sigh) or internal (your own sense of right and wrong), and it runs constantly, not only when an officer is present.
“Sanction always means punishment.”
In sociology a sanction is any reward or punishment used to enforce a norm. Positive sanctions — praise, a bonus, a commendation — are half of the story.
“If no one is watching, social control is off.”
Internalized norms keep people conforming with no audience at all — that is internal social control, and it is why most people follow rules even when they could not be caught.
“Formal control is always fair or wise.”
Formal control is made and applied by people, so it can be uneven and can target behavior most people consider harmless. Noticing that is part of the sociology, not a policy claim.
Easily confused
Internal social control vs. External social control
Both produce conformity, but internal control runs on internalized norms and needs no audience, while external control runs on pressure from other people or systems — rewards, punishments, institutions.
Informal sanctions vs. Formal sanctions
Informal sanctions happen in face-to-face interaction, like a frown or a thank-you; formal sanctions are officially recognized and enforced, like a fine or a commendation. The same act can draw both.
Positive sanctions vs. Negative sanctions
Positive sanctions reward conformity — praise, a bonus, a commendation; negative sanctions punish violations — a scolding, a fine, a suspension. Both steer behavior, one by pulling and one by pushing.
Key vocabulary
- social control
- The regulation and enforcement of norms — the mechanisms a society uses to encourage conformity and maintain order.
- social order
- An arrangement of practices and behaviors on which a society's members base their daily lives.
- internal social control
- Self-regulation: conformity that comes from norms a person has internalized, so it operates with no outside pressure.
- external social control
- Conformity produced by pressure from outside the person — reactions, rewards, punishments, or systems of enforcement.
- sanction
- A reward or punishment used to enforce a norm; the means by which rules are enforced.
- positive sanction
- A reward given for conforming to a norm, such as praise, a bonus, or an official commendation.
- negative sanction
- A punishment for violating a norm, such as a frown, a fine, or a suspension.
- formal sanction
- A sanction that is officially recognized and enforced by an organization or institution.
- informal sanction
- A sanction that occurs in face-to-face interaction, such as a smile or a disapproving glance.
Sources & references
- 3.2 Elements of Culture — Introduction to Sociology 3e — OpenStax, Rice University
- 7.1 Deviance and Control — Introduction to Sociology 3e — OpenStax, Rice University
- Ch. 7 Key Terms — Introduction to Sociology 3e — OpenStax, Rice University
- Social Norms (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) — Stanford University
EliExplains lessons are original prose written from the open, credible references above. See Copyright & Licensing.
Researched 2026-08-22
Educational content only. It is not medical, legal or professional advice. Found an error? Tell us.