Introduction to Psychology · Memory and Cognition
Language and Language Development
On this page 7 sections
In 30 seconds
Language A structured, symbolic system for generating and conveying meaning. Full entry → is a structured, symbolic system — built from phonemes and morphemes governed by Grammar The rules of a language. Full entry → — that lets people communicate an unlimited range of ideas. Children acquire it with striking speed and consistency, moving from Babbling Early repetitive speech-like sounds. Full entry → to single words, two-word phrases, and rule-governed speech, including Overregularization Over-applying grammar rules ("goed"). Full entry →. Theories debate how much is innate (Chomsky Linguist who proposed innate universal grammar. Full entry →'s nativist view) versus learned (Skinner Behaviorist who framed language as learned behavior. Full entry →'s operant account), with Interactionist Innate capacity shaped by social input. Full entry → views combining both. The Linguistic relativity Language influences thought. Full entry → hypothesis asks how much language shapes thought, and it is important to distinguish genuine language disorders from normal dialect and language variation.
Why this matters
Educators and clinicians must distinguish language disorder — a clinically significant difficulty with language that interferes with Communication Any transfer of information, including non-linguistic signals. Full entry → and daily functioning and warrants professional assessment — from ordinary variation such as dialect, bilingualism, or a temporary lag. Mislabeling a bilingual child as "language delayed" is both inaccurate and harmful. Speech-language pathologists use normed tools to assess phonology, morphology, Syntax Rules for word order and sentence structure. Full entry →, Semantics Rules and knowledge about meaning. Full entry →, and Pragmatics Rules for appropriate, context-aware use of language. Full entry → and to provide support. Knowledge of the typical timeline (babbling, one-word, two-word stages) helps caregivers and teachers recognize when a referral for evaluation is appropriate, and understanding the critical period underscores the value of early language-rich environments. This is educational information about typical and atypical development, not a diagnostic or treatment recommendation for any individual.
The college version
1. What Language Is (and Isn't)
Language is a system of symbols (spoken, signed, or written) combined by rules to convey meaning, capable of generating novel messages. Communication is broader — any transfer of information, including animal signals, gestures, and facial expressions. Language is special because of its productivity (we can create new sentences) and structure. Its building blocks are:
- Phonemes — the smallest distinctive sound units (e.g., the "p" and "b" that distinguish "pat" from "bat").
- Morphemes — the smallest units that carry meaning (e.g., "un-," "break," "-able").
- Grammar — the system of rules governing a language, including:
- Syntax — rules for word order and sentence structure.
- Semantics — rules and knowledge about meaning.
- Pragmatics — rules for using language appropriately in social context.
2. Language Acquisition: The Typical Timeline
Language acquisition is the process by which children learn their language. Across cultures it follows a predictable path:
- Babbling (around 4-6 months) — infants produce speech-like sounds ("ba-ba-ba"), practicing the phonemes of their environment.
- One-word stage (around 12 months) — single words ("milk," "dog") carry whole-sentence meaning (holophrases).
- Two-word stage (around 18-24 months) — telegraphic, two-word combinations ("more juice," "daddy go") follow early word-order rules.
- Overregularization (around 2-3 years) — children apply grammatical rules too broadly ("goed," "foots," "runned"), evidence that they are extracting rules, not just imitating.
3. How Language Develops: Theories and Influences
Three broad positions explain acquisition:
- Nativist view (Noam Chomsky) — humans are born with an innate language-acquisition device and universal grammar; the environment merely triggers and tunes it. Chomsky argued children produce novel, rule-governed sentences they have never heard, faster than imitation could explain.
- Learning theory (B. F. Skinner) — language is acquired through operant conditioning: reinforcement, imitation, and shaping. Parents reward approximations of words, so speech is built up from environment.
- Interactionist view — language emerges from the interaction between an innate capacity and a rich social environment; caregivers provide input, joint attention, and contingent responding that scaffold learning. Most researchers today hold some interactionist position.
A related claim is the critical period hypothesis: there is a biologically optimal window (roughly early childhood to puberty) for effortless language acquisition, after which learning a first language becomes much harder. Evidence from late-exposed signers and cases of extreme deprivation supports the idea, though the exact boundaries remain debated. Linguistic relativity (associated with Benjamin Lee Whorf) is the hypothesis that language influences how we think and perceive — a weaker version ("language influences thought," e.g., color or spatial terms) is better supported than the strong version ("language determines thought").
How it works
- Infants attend to human speech and begin babbling, tuning phonemes to their language.
- Around their first birthday they enter the one-word stage, using single words to express whole meanings.
- They combine words in the two-word stage, following early word-order rules.
- As grammar expands, children produce overregularizations, revealing internalized rules.
- Acquisition proceeds most easily within the critical period; later learning relies more on effort and explicit instruction.
- Throughout, the emerging system serves communication, with syntax, semantics, and pragmatics maturing together.
Common confusions
| Do not confuse | With | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Language | Communication | Communication is any information transfer; language is a structured symbolic system. |
| Phoneme | Morpheme | Phoneme = sound unit; morpheme = meaning unit. |
| Syntax | Semantics | Syntax = word order/structure; semantics = meaning. |
| Semantics | Pragmatics | Semantics = literal meaning; pragmatics = appropriate social use. |
| Nativist theory | Learning theory | Innate universal grammar vs. learned via conditioning/imitation. |
| Critical period | Sensitive period | Critical implies a hard cutoff; sensitive implies an optimal-but-flexible window. |
| Language disorder | Language variation | A clinical impairment vs. a normal dialect/bilingual pattern. |
Memory aids
Remember "Please Make Grammar Sound Pretty" for the building blocks — Phonemes, Morphemes, Grammar, Syntax (and Pragmatics) — and "Nurture vs. Nature" for the debate: Skinner = Shaping by the environment, Chomsky = Child brings innate grammar, and Interactionist = In-between.
Quick review
Topic Recap
Language is a productive symbolic system built from phonemes and morphemes governed by grammar (syntax, semantics, pragmatics), and it is a special case of communication. Children acquire it through a predictable sequence — babbling, one-word, two-word stages, and overregularization — explained by an interaction of innate capacity (Chomsky) and environmental learning (Skinner), within a likely critical period. Linguistic relativity suggests language modestly shapes thought, and clinicians carefully separate disorder from variation.
Knowledge Check
- The smallest unit of meaning in a language is called what?
- A child says "foots" instead of "feet." What process does this illustrate?
- Which theorist argued that language is learned through reinforcement and imitation?
- Which theory holds that humans are born with an innate language-acquisition device?
- The hypothesis that language shapes the way we think is known as what?
Answers and Rationales
- Morpheme — phonemes are sound units; morphemes are the smallest units carrying meaning.
- Overregularization — the child over-applies the regular "-s" plural rule, showing rule learning.
- Skinner — he framed verbal behavior in terms of operant conditioning and imitation.
- Nativist theory (Chomsky) — it posits innate universal grammar and a language-acquisition device.
- Linguistic relativity — associated with Whorf, the claim that language influences (or, in its strong form, determines) thought.

Eli explains
The same idea, in plain words
Explain it like I’m 10
Think of language as a LEGO set with an instruction manual. The phonemes are the individual bricks (basic sounds), and morphemes are the smallest meaningful pieces you snap together (like "-ed" for past tense). Grammar is the instruction manual that says how pieces may combine; syntax is the rule about the order of bricks, semantics is what the finished model means, and pragmatics is knowing when to show someone your model politely. Communication is the much bigger category of passing information — a dog barking or a raised eyebrow — while language is the special LEGO-like system humans use that can build an infinite number of brand-new structures.
Where it stops being exact: LEGO instructions are written down and fixed, whereas grammar rules live in speakers' heads, change over time, and are "broken" constantly in casual speech without any loss of meaning. The analogy also makes language look more rigid than the flexible, living system it actually is.
Simple Example
A toddler who says "I goed to the store" has never heard an adult say "goed" — yet she produced it. That overregularization shows she has learned the rule (add "-ed" for past tense), not just copied phrases, which is a key argument for an active, rule-building mind.
Worked example
- Skinner (1957) and Chomsky's (1959) critique: Skinner proposed that verbal behavior is shaped by reinforcement. Chomsky's review argued this cannot account for the speed, creativity, and uniformity of acquisition, nor for children's systematic errors like overregularization, which adults never model. This debate framed the field.
- Naturalistic and diary studies (e.g., Roger Brown's longitudinal studies of "Adam, Eve, and Sarah") documented the one-word and two-word stages and the emergence of grammatical morphemes in a stable order, supporting both innate timing and environmental input.
- Critical-period evidence: Studies of deaf children who learned a sign language only after adolescence found less fluent grammatical mastery than early learners, suggesting a sensitive window for first-language grammar.
- Methodological limits: Most early evidence was correlational and observational — for example, a positive correlation between the amount of caregiver speech and a child's vocabulary does not by itself prove causation, because parents may also respond to a talkative child. Case studies of deprivation are rare and involve confounding factors. Linguistic-relativity experiments often show small effects and are difficult to separate language from general culture; claims of strong determinism have not been replicated. Note also that bilingual or bidialectal children are not "delayed" — this is variation, not disorder.
Key takeaways
- High yield: Phoneme = smallest sound unit; morpheme = smallest meaning unit — do not reverse these.
- High yield: Overregularization ("goed") is the classic evidence that children learn rules, not just imitation.
- High yield: Chomsky (nativist) vs. Skinner (learning) is the canonical debate; the interactionist view blends them.
- Syntax is word order; semantics is meaning; pragmatics is social use.
- The critical period suggests an early window for effortless first-language acquisition.
- Linguistic relativity (Whorf) is best supported in its weak form (language influences thought).
- Bilingualism and dialect use are variation, not disorder.
- Caregiver-speech and vocabulary studies are largely correlational, not proof of causation.
Study tools & related lessonsYou’ll learn to · Key vocabulary · Related
You’ll learn to
- Define language and distinguish it from general communication, describing its basic building blocks (phonemes, morphemes, grammar, syntax, semantics, pragmatics).
- Trace the typical milestones of language acquisition from babbling through the one-word and two-word stages and overregularization.
- Compare the nativist (Chomsky) and learning (Skinner) accounts and the interactionist synthesis, including the idea of a critical period.
- Explain the linguistic relativity hypothesis and distinguish language disorder from language variation.
Key vocabulary
- Language
- A structured, symbolic system for generating and conveying meaning.
- Communication
- Any transfer of information, including non-linguistic signals.
- Phoneme
- Smallest distinctive sound unit.
- Morpheme
- Smallest meaning-carrying unit.
- Grammar
- The rules of a language.
- Syntax
- Rules for word order and sentence structure.
- Semantics
- Rules and knowledge about meaning.
- Pragmatics
- Rules for appropriate, context-aware use of language.
- Language acquisition
- The process by which children learn language.
- Babbling
- Early repetitive speech-like sounds.
- One-word stage
- Single words used as whole sentences.
- Two-word stage
- Two-word telegraphic combinations.
- Overregularization
- Over-applying grammar rules ("goed").
- Critical period
- A biologically optimal window for acquisition.
- Chomsky
- Linguist who proposed innate universal grammar.
- Skinner
- Behaviorist who framed language as learned behavior.
- Nativist vs. learning theory
- Innate capacity vs. environment/conditioning.
- Interactionist
- Innate capacity shaped by social input.
- Linguistic relativity
- Language influences thought.
- Language disorder vs. variation
- A clinical impairment vs. a normal dialect or bilingual pattern.
Educational content only. It is not medical, legal or professional advice. Found an error? Tell us.
